| Annotation |
The article reveals mostly not a scientific character of the post-soviet domestic cognition of the financial and legal reality and the obtained by virtue of it knowledge about this reality. The conclusion is substantiated as follows: since the Law, including Financial Law, has a procedural nature, the scientific cognition of it should be performed in accordance with non-classical standards of the scientism. It is summarized that in this case the science of Financial Law as a transitional phenomenon should contain the following qualitatively singled and functionally autonomic levels of reflections on financial-legal reality; philosophy of Financial Law (including the methodology of its cognition); sociology of Financial Law; doctrine of Financial Law, empiric investigations of Financial Law. The expectancy is grounded as follows: the transformation of branch legal sciences, according to above-formulated principle in a strict correspondence with non-classical standards of the scientism, will cause practical self-liquidation of general-theoretical legal science as the subjectless legal cognition, and transform, characteristic for the post-soviet tradition of legal cognition, branch legal sciences into four above-mentioned levels of legal cognition. |
