The desire for a systematic understanding of the socio-legal mission of administrative law inevitably creates the need for a scientific forecast of the evolution of his doctrine, taking into account the presence in the Ukrainian socio-cultural development of postmodern locations

. Analysis of postmodernism showed the following. In the legal space, it has no positive characteristics. Postmodernity is a negative phenomenon. The values of postmodernism are the antipodes of law (nihilism, unsystematicity, fragmentation, chaotization). He builds these bad qualities into the consciousness of society.

The aim of the article is to gain new knowledge about algorithms for overcoming postmodern tendencies by administrative law and implementation through its doctrine and subject of legal meanings of stability, systemicity, consistency in the interaction of government and civil society.

The methodology used in this work is harmonized with the principal position, according to which the use of one or another method cannot be reduced to a single formulation, and specific research technologies (procedures of analysis, comparison, systematics, periodization, etc.) vary depending on the nature of the subject of research and its purpose. However, we shall emphasize that the search tools include methods of phenomenological and systematic analysis, narrative, historical and genetic, method of ideal constructions and others.

The article introduces the idea that administrative law, under the influence of postmodern encroachments, although it has undergone corresponding distortions, has not lost its role as a regulator of relations between the government and civil society.

Both doctrine and administrative law and its subject matter have not always been negatively affected by postmodern trends. It can be assumed that the ideology of postmodernism has led to the emergence of progressive practices, in particular the adoption of the Concept of Administrative Reform. As a result, the industry gained service content and lost its totalitarian dependence on government doctrine.

 Deprivation of dependence on postmodernism is associated with the latest research in the doctrine and subject of administrative law. Their most important result was the recognition that the fact that the concept is systematic is a bifurcation point on the way to separation from the postmodern.

 Studies of the systemic nature of the subject and administrative law doctrine have determined the recognition of the relationship of administrative obligations and the related principle of protection of legitimate expectations as a new principle of administrative law.

The entry of administrative law into the paradigm of systemicity determined, first, overcoming postmodern disintegration and fragmentation of the structure of the subject, and secondly, evolution: a) from the right of satellite of public administration; b) through service law; c) to the right to form legal meanings government and civil society.

By the formation of legal meanings in the field of interaction between government and civil society, we understand the generation of normatively expressed motivation in government and civil society to turn the knowledge directed to them into practical law enforcement activities.

 Thus, the modern administrative law of Ukraine, having undergone radical changes and transformations in its path, becomes in the legal system the right to form legal sense in the field of interaction between government and civil society.

Bibliography

Authored books

 1. Dugin A, Geopolitika postmoderna (Amfora 2007) (in Russian).

2. Kozlov Ju, Administrativnoe pravo: uchebnik (Jurist» 1999) (in Russian).

3. Pavlov A, Postpostmodernizm: kak social’naja i kul’turnaja teorii objasnjajut nashe vremja (Delo 2019) (in Russian).

4. Vasil’ev A, Pravovaja doktrina kak istochnik prava. Voprosy teorii i istorii (Prospekt 2021) (in Russian).

5. Zazaeva N, Ontologicheskaja sushhnost’ prava: antropologichesko-cennostnyj podhod (Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta 2005) (in Russian).

Edited and translated books

6. Anderson P, Istoki postmoderna (per s angl, Territorija budushhego 2011) (in Russian).

7. Bytiak Yu, ‘Doktrynalni napriamky rozvytku nauky administratyvnoho prava’ v Pytannia administratyvnoho prava, kn 1 (Pysarenko N vidp za vyp, Pravo 2017) (in Ukrainian).

8. Dzhejmison F, Postmodernizm, ili kul’turnaja logika pozdnego kapitalizma (per s angl, Izd-vo in-ta Gajdara 2019) (in Russian).

9. Harvi D, Sostojanie postmoderna: Issledovanie istokov kul’turnyh izmenenij (per s angl, Izdatel’skij dom Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki 2021) (in Russian).

10. Koliushko I, ‘Slova pam’iati’ v Aver’ianov Vadym Borysovych. Vybrani naukovi pratsi (Shemshuchenko Iu, Andriiko O red, Instytut derzhavy i prava im V M Koretskoho NAN Ukrainy 2011) (in Ukrainian).

11. Kolpakov V, ‘Administratyvne pravo: suchasni problemy predmeta’ v Pravo i derzhava suchasnoi Ukrainy: problemy rozvytku ta vzaiemodii: zbirka naukovukh prats (Kyivskyi nats un-t vnutr sprav 2008) (in Ukrainian).

12. Kolpakov V, ‘Paradyhma “poniattia administratyvnoho prava”: zmist i novely v systemi universalii’ v Pytannia administratyvnoho prava, kn 3 (Pysarenko N vid za vyp, Pravo 2019) (in Ukrainian).

13. Kolpakov V, ‘Predmet administratyvnoho prava: poniattia, struktura i systema administratyvno-pravovykh vidnosyn’ v Pytannia administratyvnoho prava, kn 2, t 2 (Oberih 2018) (in Ukrainian).

14. Selivanov A, ‘Konstytutsiini zasady stanovlennia i rozvytku administratyvnoi yustytsii i administratyvnoho protsesu v umovakh realizatsii doktryny spravedlyvoho sudochynstva’ Pravova systema Ukrainy: istoriia, stan ta perspektyvy, t 2: Konstytutsiini zasady pravovoi systemy Ukrainy i problemy yii vdoskonalennia (Bytiak Iu red, Pravo 2008) (in Ukrainian).

15. Velyka ukrainska yurydychna entsyklopediia, t 5 Administratyvne pravo (Bytiak Iu holova redkol, Pravo 2021) (in Ukrainian).

16. Yurydychna entsyklopediia, t 2: D–I (Shemshuchenko Iu red, Ukrainska entsyklopediia im M P Bazhana, 1999) (in Ukrainian).

Journal articles

17. Tate P, ‘The coherence of “Legitimate Expectations” and the Foundation of Natural Justice’ (1988) 14 Monash University Law Review 48–9 (in English). 18. Aver’ianov V, ‘Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy: doktrynalni aspekty reformuvannia’ (1998) 8 Pravo Ukrainy 8–13 (in Ukrainian). 19. Aver’ianov V, ‘Predmet administratyvnoho prava: nova doktrynalna otsinka’ (2004) 10 Pravo Ukrainy 25–30 (in Ukrainian).

20. Aver’ianov V, ‘Stanovlennia novoi doktryny ukrainskoho administratyvnoho prava’ (2007) 28 Yurydychnyi visnyk Ukrainy 1–5 (in Ukrainian).

21. Bochkarjov S, ‘Istoki postmoderna o podlinnom smysle i prednaznachenii postprava’ (2021) 11 Gosudarstvo i pravo 24–36 (in Russian).

22. Chestnov I, ‘Pravoponimanie v jepohu postmoderna’ (2002) 2 Pravovedenie 4–16 (in Russian).

23. Fedoruk N, ‘Publichne pravo Ukrainy v umovakh postindustrialnoi derzhavy’ (2020) 2 Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava 51–4 (in Ukrainian).

24. Fursa S, ‘Instytut notariatu v yurydychnii doktryni Ukrainy: aktualni problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku’ (2020) 9 Pravo Ukrainy 11–9 (in Ukrainian).

25. Horbatenko V, ‘Postmodern i transformatsiia tsinnisnoi osnovy liudskoho buttia’ (2005) 1 Politychnyi menedzhment 3–13 (in Ukrainian).

26. Kolomoiets T, Kolpakov V, ‘Doktryna ta predmet: sutnist i zmist administratyvnoho prava’ (2021) 19 Pravo Ukrainy 12–27 (in Ukrainian).

27. Kolomoiets T, Kolpakov V, ‘Suchasna paradyhma administratyvnoho prava: geneza i poniattia’ (2017) 5 Pravo Ukrainy 71–9 (in Ukrainian).

28. Kryzhanovskyi A, ‘Doktryna pravovoho poriadku v Ukraini: henezys, suchasnyi stan i perspektyvy’ (2013) 9 Pravo Ukrainy 229–42 (in Ukrainian).

29. Kutsepal S, ‘Pislia postmodernizmu: “nashchadky” / “masky”?’ (filosofskyi nacherk) (2021) 22 Aktualni problemy dukhovnosti 215–25 (in Ukrainian).

30. Maksymov S, ‘Pravova doktryna: filosofsko-pravovyi pidkhid’ (2013) 9 Pravo Ukrainy 34–54 (in Ukrainian).

31. Maksymov S, ‘Teoriia pryrodnoho prava: kontseptualnyi i doktrynalnyi vymiry’ (2021) 1 Pravo Ukrainy 43–65 (in Ukrainian).

32. Menshenina A, ‘Postmodern vs. postpostmodern: mozhlyvosti osiahnennia politychnoi diisnosti’ [2021] 22 (30) Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova. Seriia 22. Politychni nauky ta metodyka vykladannia sotsialno-politychnykh dystsyplin 30–7 (in Ukrainian).

33. Ratnikov V, ‘Postmodernizm: istoki, stanovlenie, sushhnost’’ [2002] 4 (29) Filosofija i obshhestvo (in Russian).

34. Rodian M, ‘Rozvytok postmodernizmu: metodolohichni pryntsypy, teorii, zasady’ (2021) 2 Perspektyvy. Sotsialno-politychnyi zhurnal 102–7 (in Ukrainian).

35. Safronov Je, ‘Sostojanie postmoderna v 2021 godu’ (2021) 1 Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies (in Russian).

36. Sherstoboev O, ‘Zashhita zakonnyh ozhidanij – osnovopolagajushhij princip administrativnogo prava’ (2019) 2 Administrativnoe pravo i process 21–5 (in Russian).

37. Sorokin V, Kutjavina M, ‘Tolkovanie prava v interpretacii postmodernizma’ [2018] 2 (15) Rossijskij zhurnal pravovyh issledovanij 54 (in Russian).

38. Tepliuk M, ‘Konstytutsiine vyznachennia publichnoi vlady – kliuchova lanka yurydychnoi doktryny Ukrainy’ (2021) 2 Pravo Ukrainy 29–41 (in Ukrainian).

39. Varlamova N, ‘Metodolohiia yurydychnoi nauky: spokusa postmodernom’ (2014) 1 Pravo Ukrainy 69–77 (in Ukrainian).

40. Vel’sh V, ‘Postmodern. Genealogija i znachenie odnogo spornogo ponjatija’ (1992) 1 Put’. Mezhdunarodnyj filosofskij zhurnal 109–36 (in Russian).

41. Yurii M, ‘Prezydentski vybory yak dzerkalo postmodernu’ (2021) 9 Mediaforum 11–27 (in Ukrainian).

Conference papers

42. Kolpakov V, ‘Categories “Essence” and “Content” in administrative law’ v Modern aspects of modernization of science: status, problems, development trends Lisbon: Scientific prospects. Т. 2 № 12 (2021) 90–3 (in English).

43. Kolpakov V, ‘Fenomenolohyia doktrynы admynystratyvnoho prava’ v XI Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii, t 1, vyp 1 (Naukovi perspektyvy 2021) 82–6 (in Ukrainian).

Websites

44. Holovenko R, ‘Postmoderna plutanyna z vyznachenniamy mediinykh terminiv’ (Instytut masovoi informatsii, 03.09.2021) <https://imi.org.ua/monitorings/statuszhurnalistazmi-j-zhurnalistyka-v-epohu-postmodernu-i41034> (accessed: 10.01.2022) (in Ukrainian).